http://astronomynotesnet.disqus.com/enWed, 15 Apr 2009 15:12:35 -0000http://www.astronomynotes.net/2007/07/15/qhy5-received/#comment-8236418Looking forward for the detailed information about QHY5. Anyway, thanks for this.jieleaWed, 15 Apr 2009 15:12:35 -0000http://www.astronomynotes.net/2007/07/15/qhy5-received/#comment-4518816Hi Saxon! <br><br>There's a post showing the Jupiter taken with QHY5. Let me show you~ <br><a href="http://www.astronomynotes.net/2008/07/28/first-serious-attempt-on-jupiter/" rel="nofollow">http://www.astronomynotes.net/2008/07/28/first-...</a>astrobinFri, 19 Dec 2008 06:57:35 -0000http://www.astronomynotes.net/2007/07/15/qhy5-received/#comment-4514737wow...looks nice.<br><br>can't wait for the reviewSaxonThu, 18 Dec 2008 22:43:02 -0000http://www.astronomynotes.net/2007/07/15/qhy5-received/#comment-4388355Boothee,<br>I have to get a C to 1.25" adapter first before I can take any photo. Hehe~ Thanks for pointing out the mistake. It's truly 1.3 megapixels instead of 130 megapixels. :)RobinThu, 06 Sep 2007 11:05:23 -0000http://www.astronomynotes.net/2007/07/15/qhy5-received/#comment-4388354Can't wait to see the pics taken with your QHY5. :)<br>Cheers!!!<br>bootheebootheeThu, 06 Sep 2007 07:57:54 -0000