http://astronomynotesnet.disqus.com/enWed, 15 Apr 2009 15:12:35 -0000http://www.astronomynotes.net/2007/07/15/qhy5-received/#comment-8236418<p>Looking forward for the detailed information about QHY5. Anyway, thanks for this. </p>jieleaWed, 15 Apr 2009 15:12:35 -0000http://www.astronomynotes.net/2007/07/15/qhy5-received/#comment-4518816<p>Hi Saxon!</p><p>There's a post showing the Jupiter taken with QHY5. Let me show you~ <br><a href="http://www.astronomynotes.net/2008/07/28/first-serious-attempt-on-jupiter/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.astronomynotes.net/2008/07/28/first-serious-attempt-on-jupiter/">http://www.astronomynotes.n...</a></p>Robin LeeFri, 19 Dec 2008 06:57:35 -0000http://www.astronomynotes.net/2007/07/15/qhy5-received/#comment-4514737<p>wow...looks nice.</p><p>can't wait for the review </p>SaxonThu, 18 Dec 2008 22:43:02 -0000http://www.astronomynotes.net/2007/07/15/qhy5-received/#comment-4388355<p>Boothee,<br>I have to get a C to 1.25" adapter first before I can take any photo. Hehe~ Thanks for pointing out the mistake. It's truly 1.3 megapixels instead of 130 megapixels. :)</p>RobinThu, 06 Sep 2007 11:05:23 -0000http://www.astronomynotes.net/2007/07/15/qhy5-received/#comment-4388354<p>Can't wait to see the pics taken with your QHY5. :)<br>Cheers!!!<br>boothee</p>bootheeThu, 06 Sep 2007 07:57:54 -0000